I miss U

我只是很想你，真的很想。。。

又不知道应该怎么做，刚刚给你打了电话，幸亏你接了，只是很想听到你的声音，不懂为何我要把自己弄得如此卑微，但是逆向思考，我之前是不是过于自大了吗？

你说，我每次给你打电话，都是一幅找架吵的样子，我也不想的，只是我真的不懂得怎么去表达，怎么去控制，怎么去描述那种蚀骨的思念。。。

我很糟糕，尽管我已经很努力的都给自己的每一天找事做，念书，但是还是会想你，一直的想，想什么我也不晓得，就是想念呗。。。

我也不懂我一直得把自己的底线拉低，会怎么样？我已经没有那个心力去猜，这种估计我永远都不能确定它的准确性，只会让我更加胡思乱想。。。

我好想你，大家最近都说我变了，有些说我越变越好，有些说，不知曾几何时，我散步的脚步已经变得很沉重，不像以前那么轻快，有些说我变得比较会懂得体谅以及聆听，好多好多的意见，感谢你们。。

我现在也说不出什么好东西来，好累好饿好睏，大家晚安！

一样

我们的出发点不一样， 我们的追求素质也不一样。

你的年龄和我不一样，你的沟通方式和我也不一样。

你和我不一样。

可是我们都一样，
是人，
会呼吸，
一样有两粒眼睛，一个鼻子，两个耳朵，一个嘴巴，
在同一个天空下，
在一个地球上，
你再怎么厉害， 我们也只能穿一条裤子，
你怎么有钱， 你一次也只能驾一辆车，
你再怎么强， 我们都是要死。

我们都一样。

送给优柔寡断的我

在这个竞争异常激烈的社会，优柔寡断是使不得的。

优柔寡断的人容易怀疑自己的能力，容易受负面情绪影响。

本文赠送17条金玉良言，经常胡思乱想和优柔寡断的人一定要看！

(P.s. 我把它们当圣经了！)

1. 不要在流泪的时候做任何决定，情绪负面的时候说话越 少越好！

2. 不要去反复思考一个问题，不要把所有的感情都放在一个人身上，你还有父母，还有其他朋友！

3. 不要害怕做错什么，即使错了，也不必懊恼，人生本来就是对对错错，何况有许多事，回头看来，对错已经无所谓了。

4. 有负面情绪是正常的，但是自己一定要知道，要明白这只是生活的一小部分，在其余的时间里，要尽量的让情绪平稳起来。

5. 无论发生怎样的变故，不要打破生活原有的规律，要按时吃饭，按时睡觉。

6. 不要去害怕做一件事，不要害怕触景伤情，不要害怕说错话，不要害怕想起过去，不要害怕面对未来。

7. 无论是对是错，你需要一个准则，你的行为应该遵循这个准则，并根据现实生活不断的修正。反反复复优柔寡断的人，是不可能讨人喜欢的，在对错之间徘徊的人，形象不如从错到对的人正面。

8. 当他说“让我们冷静一段时间好吗？”的时候，要冷静的说好，然后挂断电话。不要哀求，他不是来征求你意见的。

9. 不要把心底的话全掏出来，这些是只属于你的财富。

10. 不要跟一个人和他议论同一个圈子里的人，不管你认为他有多可靠。

11. 当你不知道和他说什么的时候，那就什么也不要说，沉默有无限种含义。

12. 不要追求什么结果，每个人结果都一样，就是死亡。

13. 不要后悔，无论怎样都不要后悔，后悔的情绪比你所做错的事更可怕，因为这会摧残你的自信，自尊以及很有可能让你去做一件更错的事。

14. 那个人突然不联系你了，很正常；那个人突然又联系你了，也很正常，这也不说明什么。

15. 如果不懂，就说出来，如果懂了，就别说，笑笑即可。

16. 一切的烦恼都是自找的，因此也只能自己解决，不要找朋友哭诉，找他们去打球。

17. 说过的话一定要做到，即使是很蠢的话，再蠢也比言而无信好。

Fundamental liberties

There are some provisions inside the Federal Constitution which are designed to protect the freedom of the individuals. These are referred to as the fundamental liberties or fundamental rights. These rights are said to be entrenched or enshrined because it cannot be altered or taken away altogether unless the constitution itself is amended. This can only be done with a special resolution of two-third of all the members of the Parliament.

The nature and effects of fundamental liberties so enshrined may be explained as follows:

1. No person may be subject to slavery or forced labour.

-The constitution recognises that individuals should not be regarded as property of others, and thus bans all forms of slavery and forced labour.

-However, this right is given subject to the paramount interest of the nations. Therefore, the Parliament may make law providing for compulsory national services.

2. Citizens cannot be discriminated against in relation to appointment to any office, employment under a public authority, or in relation to acquisition of property, establishing or carrying on any trade, business, vacation or employment, merely on ground of religion, race, descent or place of birth.

-However, this right is subject to Article.153 of Federal Constitution which permit the granting of special privileges to bumiputras.

3. Citizens cannot be discriminated against in relation to providing of education, merely on ground of religion, race, descent or place of birth.

-However, this right is subject to Article. 153 as stated above.

4. Freedom of religion

-The constitution also entrenched the right of the individuals to practice, profess or propagate his own religion.

-However, as Islam is the religion of the country, restrictions may be placed upon the propagation of the religions among muslims.

5. No person may be banished from the country.

-However, this right is subject to the exceptions that federal government is permitted to deprive one person of his citizenship under certain circumstances.

Rules in Foss v Harbottle

The rule in Foss v Harbottle contains two principles.

The first principles is the proper plaintiff principle, also referred to as proper plaintiff rules. This means where a wrong is done to the company, only the company itself can sue to remedy it. Therefore, an individual member is not allowed to sue in the name of company.

The second principles is the majority principle, also referred to as majority rules. This mean where an alleged wrong is made binding on the company by a simple majority of the members, the minority must abide by that majority decisions.

This rule is a very important one because it upholds the status of the company as a separate legal entity with the power to sue and being sued in its own name. Further, it recognize that as a company is an artificial entity without its own will and mind, its decision would have to be the decisions of the members themselves. Therefore, the decisions of the majority of the members will prevail.

The following are the advantages of the rule in Foss v Harbottle:

1. It prevents multiplicity of suits.

-This means where a wrong is done to the company, this rule would enable the company to institute one action to remedy it instead of allowing members themselves to sue resulting in numerous action being brought to remedy the same wrong.

2. It prevents wasteful actions.

-As the courts are likely to accept the decision of the majority, actions brought by the minority may be a mere waste of their time, energy and money. It may also be a waste of the court's time as well.

3. It prevents vexatious actions.

-Sometimes, the actions brought solely for the purpose of harassing and embarrassing the company. This rule will eliminate this action.

Despite these advantages, this rule brings at least one major disadvantages. It gives room to the majority who are in control of the company to abuse their superior position to cause grave hardship and injustice to the minority.

In order to alleviate this problem, several exceptions have been developed by the courts as following:

1. where the wrong complained of amounts to a fraud to the minority.

-In such a case, if the wrongdoers are themselves in control of the company, the minority may be permitted to bring a derivative action in the name of the company.

2. where the act complained of is ultra vires the company.

3. where there was a special resolution required for the act complained of, but was not complied with.

4. where there was an infringement of a member's personal right.

5. possibly, where the justice of the case so requires.

Distinguish between an offer and an invitation to treat

An offer or proposal is one of the essential elements to form a valid contract.

Under S.2 (a) of the Contracts Act 1950, a proposal is said to be made when one person signifies to the other his willingness to do or abstain from doing something, with a view to obtaining the assent of that other to the act or abstinence.

If the proposal is unconditionally accepted, a binding agreement arises. The offer must be clear, and if it is vague, it is not a valid offer. In the case of Gunthing v Lynn, an offer to pay an additional amount if the horse proved 'lucky' is said to be too vague.

It is important to distinguish an offer with an invitation to treat. An invitation to treat by law only amounts to an invitation to others to make offers. It is not capable of being accepted so as to form a valid binding agreement.

A good example of an invitation to treat is the display of goods for sales in the shops.

The case of Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Boots Cash Chemists servers a good example. The fact is there was a display of drugs on the shelves of the pharmacy. The issue was whether such display amounted to an offer when the customers took it and placed it in the wire basket. The court held that it did not amount to an offer, it was a mere invitation to treat. Therefore, it is very important to distinguish between an offer and an invitation to treat.

Only an offer or proposal is legally capable of being accepted thereby giving rise to a binding contract.

Revocation of a proposal

A proposer is not legally bound to keep his proposal open indefinitely. Thus, the proposal will remain valid until it is revoked by its proposer.

By S.5 (1) of the Contracts Act 1950, a proposal may be revoked at any time before the communication of acceptance is complete as against the proposer.

By S.6 of the Contracts Act 1950, a proposal may be revoked under the following conditions:

1. By the communication of notice of revocation by the proposer to the other parties.

-Under this section, the proposer is required to communicate the revocation.

-Communication by third parties not authorized by the proposer will probably not valid.

2. By the lapse of the time prescribed in the proposal for its acceptance, or if no time is prescribed, by the lapse of a reasonable time, without any communication of acceptance.

3. By the failure of the acceptor to fulfill a condition precedent to acceptance.

4. By the death or mental disorder of the proposer, if the fact of his death or mental disorder comes to the knowledge of the acceptor before the acceptance.

-The death or mental disorder of the proposer does not automatically amounts to a revocation of offers.

-Knowledge of the acceptor is a crucial factor.

-If the acceptor, in ignorance of the death or mental disorder of the proposer, accept the offer, such acceptance would be valid.

-However, if the acceptor was aware of it, it will not be valid.

Corporate Governance

Corporate governance may be said to refer to the set of processes, customs, policies, laws and rules that affecting the way a corporation is directed, administered or controlled. It also includes the relationships between many persons who have a stake in the company and the goals which the corporation is governed.

In Malaysia, the High Level Finance Committee Report on Corporate Governance defined corporate governance as 'the set of processes and structure used to direct and manage the business of the company towards enhancing the business prosperity and corporate accountability with the ultimate objective of realizing long-term shareholders value, whilst taking in accounting the interest of other stakeholders.'.

In essence, corporate governance is a set of principles and best practices, which a company should follow to achieve the purposes indicated in the High Level Finance Committee Report on Corporate Governance.

Main characteristics of a partnership

A partnership is defined as a relationship that subsists between persons carrying on business in common with a view of profit.

By the virtue of this definition, the following are the characteristics of a partnership:

1. There must be an association of persons.

-Person include not only natural persons, but also artificial persons, like corporations.

-However, S.3 (2) of the Partnership Act 1961 specifically provides that a relationship between members of any company or associations registered as a co-operative society will not constitute a partnership.

-For there to be a partnership, there must not be more than one person.

-However, by the S.47 (2) of the Partnership Act 1961 provides that the number of persons cannot exceed 20 in the case of ordinary partnership.

-Professional partnership is not subject to this limit.

2. The persons must carrying on a business.

-S.2 of the Partnership Act 1961 provides the business to include every trade, occupation or profession.

-It must be shown that the business is presently or currently carried on.

3. The business must be carried on in common.

-What this means is that the partners must have possessed a common intention to carry on a business.

-It is not necessary that all partners be actively involved.

-Even if some partners are simply leave the running of the business to others, on the understanding that they would still benefit from the business, there would still be a partnership.

4. The business must be carried on with a view of profit.

-What this means is that the business must be carried on with a profit motives.

-Non-profit oriented business such as social, recreational or charitable organisation will not be considered as partnerships.

回家真好

回来美里已经2天了！

这里真的是我的家乡，实在是太享受了！第一天回来的时候，是晚上了！
一回到，就滔滔不绝的根老妈老爸在车上聊到不行，口水都不够用啊！
那晚，睡得特别香！

星期日一早就起床，跟老爸老妈老弟，一起去吃早餐，呵呵呵。。我魂牵梦系的水饺，啊啊啊啊啊！还是那么好吃，可惜最近的经济风暴很明显在这个水饺的体积上起了不可恢复的致命效果，体积严重的小了2、3倍！呵呵呵。。。真的是心酸啊！

看看那个照片的对比，

-之前-

-现在-

哈哈哈哈。。。通货膨胀很严重厚？什么都搞缩水！

不过这水饺真的还是很好吃！说明水准不会因为体积的缩小而减低！呵呵呵。。。

明天我要开始念书了！要去这里有名的电子图书馆念我的商业法律，呵呵呵。。讲到好像很厉害这样，其实不然，只是普通的ACCA F4 nia... 念到我半条命，呵呵。。

吃到了鸿运的水饺、 俊仁爸爸的酸辣汤、 校长的粽子、 外婆的阿参鱼头，哇。。。实在太爽了！但是还有好多的美食在等着我，哈哈哈哈。。。 nasi lemak、 海南鸡饭、 家乡鸡饭、 还有更多更多。。我的上海楼、状元楼、喜来登、哇。。。

P/S: (need more exercise liao... nanti mou(没) ngan(眼) tai(看)... hahaha... )

今天下午也去Grassmen做了4条裤，分别为2条长，2条短！呵呵。。 才这么几条就要了我几百块！我现在真的是两袖清风了！呵呵。。

这4张纸就要了将近500块马币~ :'(

回到美里实在是太舒服了！有老妈，老爸的照顾！吃不用烦恼，出门不用驾车，做什么都可以跟家人商量！在家真好！

真的要回来好好的充电一番！呵呵。。。　

看戏去了！

撤

明天就要回美里了，突然间很舍不得！
也不懂在舍不得什么，就是一股浓浓的无可奈何不停的涌出在打转！
再怎么想家，也已经在这里生活了快2年了，
不可否认，都算熟悉了，这个地方。。。

这里的人，这里的食物，这里的习性。。

永远都不会忘记在2010年1月1日在古晋起床的那一刻所感到的兴奋感，及那一瞬间失落空洞的感觉，现在每天早上起来，就是习惯了，赶紧冲凉，刷牙洗脸，去上班！
我好想家，就是那个家的感觉，那种安全的感觉，但是我也了解，我只要一回美里，我个人的自由就多多少少受到限制了！

不是很好的感觉，呵呵呵。。。但是跟家人在一起的感觉真的很好！想跟老妈说，我有多想她，抱抱她！
跟老爸说，我在异乡的经历，听听他的话，毕竟老爸每次都传授我他的经验以及历练。

我是很自私的人，我不喜欢跟别人分享我的东西！
尤其是人！如果要分享，那么我就离开，没那么稀罕！
拖拖拉拉的像什么一样，累！

不过我看还是我的想象能力恐怖的多！每天吃饱太闲空，就在那里想，想东想西，想好想坏，想进想出，如此这般，这般如此，呵呵呵。。。真的是净想些有的没的来混肴自己的方向。

很糟糕，我最近越来越像个老人，像足一个已经30++ 岁的人，看这张照片！

是不是！是不是！是不是！

像足一个30多岁的人！Ah Pek到不懂得怎么说！

真是无言！

希望我的想法也能成熟一点，每次总是被小小的事情stuck在那边，他奶奶的！

哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈。。。

该工作了！真是太闲空了！呵呵呵。。 

闻

使你疲劳的不是远方的高山，而是鞋里的一粒沙。


我非常赞同，我从来都是不容易坚持的人，我从来都是优柔寡断，善变的人！ 


都是那粒沙！哈哈哈。。。 


不是我的错，都是那粒沙。。。 哈哈哈。。 


最近过得大悲大喜的，一下子又很开心，一下子又很低潮，哈哈哈哈。。不过现在有点调试好了，毕竟沟通真的很重要！


重点还是信任的问题，信心！ 我既然答应要开始，那就怎样都要好好的走下去！两次的失败不代表什么，只是我还是很生疏而已，哈哈，不过我真的要调整自己啦！


然后我终于了解了花钱的乐趣，花在对的地方，真的是很心甘情愿！
甚至是逼迫型的花费！很快乐！


所以要好好努力读书，赚多多的钱，才耐花！


过错是暂时的遗憾，错过却是长久的遗憾。


我已经错过了2次！可是对前面2个一点遗憾都没有，只有幸运2字！


哈哈哈。。。真是一个字形容，贱！


我也不懂会怎么样，也不需要懂会怎么样，就这样。。随波逐流！


我这个星期六就回美里了！几开心，可是又很不舍得！10 天叻！


不过时间很快过的啦！回美里也有很多事情做叻！


最重要是回家！回老家看看，回现在的家看看，趁着这10天看个仔细！把影像深深烙印在脑海里面，因为这次回去美里，下次再回的时候，就是过年的时候，好想老爸老妈！


真的是辛苦他们了！想来，都会有点苦苦的！


苦个屁，才几岁，天天想些有的没的！哈哈。。别想那么多了！


我要好好过我的生活！
我要好好地经营彼此！
我要好好的不让那粒沙有机可趁的让我停下脚步而退缩！


P.S: 可笑的是，我是吃饱太闲空，在公司写部落格！


大家要开心啊！